Welcome to the LeanForward, Inc. blog, which I’ve titled LeadingForward.

There is no doubt that the subject of leadership has been extensively addressed and that good research and thoughtful writing abound. The trouble, from my perspective, is that we still see far too many examples of irresponsible, unprincipled and ineffective leadership that have had a devastating impact on people and organizations. I want to be part of a movement that changes this reality and creates a core of leaders whose first priority is to serve those they lead and create positive results for all stakeholders.

In August of 2008, I left a decade of employment with Duke University to start my own company, LeanForward, Inc. I’ll wait for another day to discuss the wisdom of walking away from a secure job with a good income in the middle of a global crisis to begin a new venture. For now, just call it a leap of faith. For me, it has been a leap into a huge gap or void; not so much into an unknown and uncertain business climate, but rather into a vacuum created by a lack of principle-based leadership. This vacuum draws me – it compels me—to do something, anything, to help restore the faith people once had in leaders and redeem the hope and trust that have been lost.

The opportunity to work for an organization of the caliber of Duke (and several other good organizations over my career) provided me with a living laboratory for learning about leadership – i.e., what works and what doesn’t work in the real world. As an executive leader in human resources, I’ve had successes and my fair share of failures. I’ve tried to learn from all of these personal experiences, as well as the experiences of others. In fact, I’m still learning. The opportunity I have now is to work outside the confines of a particular organization in an effort to improve the practice of leadership across multiple organizations and industries. One way I can do this is by promoting the practice of “thought leadership.” I believe a good thought leader is someone who is a well-intentioned yet persistent provocateur and revolutionary. Provocateurs challenge embedded mental models – the cognitive shorthand we use each day to evaluate, define and respond to people and situations. Mental models need to be challenged when they keep us from being open to new ideas or inhibit our willingness to examine our conclusions about what is true. Revolutionaries challenge established practices, structures and authority. Practices, structures and authority need to be challenged when they fail to meet the legitimate needs and interests of people and organizations.

My personal mission is to play a part in helping to close the gap and fill the void created by poor leadership, and the systems and thinking that enable it. I hope this forum, and others like it, create a thoughtful, open and practical exchange of provocative, revolutionary and energizing ideas for building strong relationships and accomplishing superior results. I encourage you to join me in this effort. Your comments, suggestions and perspectives are always welcome. You may email at mark.rumbles@leanforwardinc.com.

 

RSS

Mark Rumbles, President

LeanForward, Inc. 

Author of the LeadingForward Blog

« Knowing When to "Call It" | The Truth about Keeping the Peace - Part 1 »
Wednesday
Jun162010

The Truth about Keeping the Peace - Part 2

In Part 1 of this series we discussed the tendency that most of us have to avoid speaking truth to people in our one-to-one relationships. We fear being perceived as impolite or confrontational. As a result, we may withhold feedback or information from another person, even when what we have to say is properly motivated, objective and important. In effect, our fear outweighs our desire to act in the best interests of ourselves and others.

Everyone seems to understand this fear, including companies vying for our business. Allstate Insurance recently tried to capitalize on our fear by offering a special service in the event we decide to switch our insurance coverage. They recognize that breaking up is hard to do and will contact our current insurance agent with the bad news, sparing us the pain. Forget about the fact that your current company may have been charging you exorbitant rates and only knows you by your policy number.

Our fear of giving feedback and sharing information with others should give us pause and help us think but it should not stop us in our tracks. Giving in to fear in clear truth-telling moments usually guarantees suboptimal outcomes. We make a bad trade, exchanging the opportunity for authenticity and honesty for pseudo peace.

Opportunities for personal and relational growth are stunted when we try to “sanitize” what we share with one another. This sanitation process consists of filtering, generalizing or whitewashing our feedback and information. We when sanitize, we try to play it safe by stripping the specificity and meaning out of what we have to say. We avoid risk but we end up communicating little or nothing of significance. The status quo is maintained. No one is challenged. No one grows.

Truth be told, we all need to give and to receive honest feedback from time to time about our actions and behavior. We need to be aware of what people see, hear and perceive from their interactions with us. We also need to cultivate relationships that involve the open exchange of timely, relevant and credible information.

Feedback from others serves as a mirror. It is a gift. It helps us become aware of our blind spots – the things that are not easy for us to see and acknowledge. Good information is like a GPS. It helps us make decisions and navigate our way through the intricacies of life. Regular feedback and information provided by others enables us to gain a well rounded and more accurate view of reality. Seeing reality is essential to the success of individuals, teams and organizations. When truth-telling is stifled, reality is distorted; when it is present, reality is illuminated.

Of course, our truth-telling does need to be regulated. It is not only possible, but essential that respect, tact and decorum exist on the same plain as truth-telling. It is not our right or duty to dump our feedback on people or provide them with information that is not helpful or actionable. When we engage in truth-telling, we need to carefully consider the context and purpose. In other words, the time and situation need to be right, and, our motives need to be honorable. Our truth-telling my cause someone pain, but our intent should be to heighten their awareness and support their growth. With these cautions in mind, it is important to understand that regulating our feedback and information sharing is different from sanitizing it.

Truth-telling contains color, texture and depth. It has substance. It provides a sound basis for honest reflection and purposeful action. There is a unique beauty and purity to it when done properly. These are the reasons it is so rare and so valuable. Those of us who want to promote growth in ourselves and others need to drop the BS and superficiality that pervades so much of our society. We need to fear pseudo peace more than we fear speaking and receiving the truth.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>