Welcome to the LeanForward, Inc. blog, which I’ve titled LeadingForward.

There is no doubt that the subject of leadership has been extensively addressed and that good research and thoughtful writing abound. The trouble, from my perspective, is that we still see far too many examples of irresponsible, unprincipled and ineffective leadership that have had a devastating impact on people and organizations. I want to be part of a movement that changes this reality and creates a core of leaders whose first priority is to serve those they lead and create positive results for all stakeholders.

In August of 2008, I left a decade of employment with Duke University to start my own company, LeanForward, Inc. I’ll wait for another day to discuss the wisdom of walking away from a secure job with a good income in the middle of a global crisis to begin a new venture. For now, just call it a leap of faith. For me, it has been a leap into a huge gap or void; not so much into an unknown and uncertain business climate, but rather into a vacuum created by a lack of principle-based leadership. This vacuum draws me – it compels me—to do something, anything, to help restore the faith people once had in leaders and redeem the hope and trust that have been lost.

The opportunity to work for an organization of the caliber of Duke (and several other good organizations over my career) provided me with a living laboratory for learning about leadership – i.e., what works and what doesn’t work in the real world. As an executive leader in human resources, I’ve had successes and my fair share of failures. I’ve tried to learn from all of these personal experiences, as well as the experiences of others. In fact, I’m still learning. The opportunity I have now is to work outside the confines of a particular organization in an effort to improve the practice of leadership across multiple organizations and industries. One way I can do this is by promoting the practice of “thought leadership.” I believe a good thought leader is someone who is a well-intentioned yet persistent provocateur and revolutionary. Provocateurs challenge embedded mental models – the cognitive shorthand we use each day to evaluate, define and respond to people and situations. Mental models need to be challenged when they keep us from being open to new ideas or inhibit our willingness to examine our conclusions about what is true. Revolutionaries challenge established practices, structures and authority. Practices, structures and authority need to be challenged when they fail to meet the legitimate needs and interests of people and organizations.

My personal mission is to play a part in helping to close the gap and fill the void created by poor leadership, and the systems and thinking that enable it. I hope this forum, and others like it, create a thoughtful, open and practical exchange of provocative, revolutionary and energizing ideas for building strong relationships and accomplishing superior results. I encourage you to join me in this effort. Your comments, suggestions and perspectives are always welcome. You may email at mark.rumbles@leanforwardinc.com.

 

RSS

Mark Rumbles, President

LeanForward, Inc. 

Author of the LeadingForward Blog

« Brand Names | Cultivating Curiosity »
Tuesday
Aug182009

Space Junk

Empty spaces bother us. We have an insatiable need to fill them.

Empty closets are scary places. Half full closets seem lonely, almost sad. The same goes for rooms, attics, garages, storage sheds and unused land alongside major roadways and intersections. So, we do our best to fill them. We even try to fill up empty time because it too tends to be unnerving, nagging us to intervene and interrupt it. We somehow equate emptiness with incompleteness. We think we need to help emptiness achieve fullness – to be all it can be.

The space that encircles our planet is vast and empty; at least it used to be. Over the past 50 years we have managed to start filling it up as well, to the point that we now need to be concerned about space junk. It would be a real eye sore if we could actually see it from earth without the aid of a telescope. Worse than being unsightly; however, space junk is dangerous because it is orbiting around like speeding bullets and cannon balls.

In February 2009, two satellites collided spreading nearly two tons of debris across a 500 mile area of space above our planet. More collisions are bound to happen as more stuff accumulates and junk begins colliding with other junk. And, there are other things floating around up there, including an astronaut’s glove, camera, garbage bags, and a bunch of spent rocket parts from a variety of space missions. All of the stuff in circulation poses risks to all other platforms and vehicles – including the Hubble Telescope, Space Shuttle missions, the International Space Station (ISS) and the 900+ satellites that are in orbit today.

Our pressing need to fill up empty spaces eventually bumps up against the undeniable reality of capacity. When there is nowhere else to stuff our stuff, it creates a colossal clutter problem. Ironically, similar to emptiness, clutter also draws us and impels us to intervene. It tugs on us and drains us. Clutter gums us up. Like an overtaxed computer, we eventually start to slow down, freeze up or crash. That’s why junk spaces with doors are so popular and windows are not. What we cannot see does not bother us as much. But sometimes there are no doors, and whether it is orbiting space junk or frantic lives without silence, bad consequences eventually result. We get caught up managing our clutter instead of maximizing our best moments.

The U.S. Air Force and NASA have tracking systems capable of monitoring roughly 20,000 of the most dangerous objects (larger than 10cm or 4 inches in diameter). The problem is that even an object as small as one centimeter can destroy a satellite or manned vehicle, due to the incredible orbiting velocities. NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office (yes, there is such an office) estimates there are more than 300,000 such objects (1cm or larger) in orbit right now – and potentially billions of even smaller objects that also pose significant risk. All of this mess has actually spawned new business opportunities. At least two companies have moved into this “opportunity space” by providing the U.S. Air Force with more sophisticated and sensitive databases and systems for tracking orbiting junk. The free market is amazing. So far though, no one seems to be doing anything in the trash collecting arena.

It is time that we adopt a new attitude and perspective about emptiness, and learn to embrace it rather than fill it. I am not talking about relational or spiritual emptiness. Those conditions do require our attention. Instead, I am referring primarily to the emptiness of silence. It is getting crowded out by the noise of constant activity – our “always on” lifestyles that are aided and abetted by technology. Just to be clear, technology is not the source of the problem, we are. We have become stimulation junkies. We need to detox on a periodic basis. Can’t hear yourself think? Having trouble hearing the voice of God? Don’t have time to plan, ponder, relax or dream? There are many ways to cultivate silence but it is not my place to tell you how. Search hard enough and you’ll find it. But first, recognize that silence has a renewing purpose; don’t push it away or try to fill it up. If we are not careful, we will develop a fear of silence, and that would be the greatest tragedy.

We all need to tweak up our radars and pay better attention. If we use up our capacity, we will have no reserves to draw from when we reach our toleration point. I know that many people pride themselves as extraordinary multi-taskers, but everyone with breath has limits. We need to accept that some spaces were meant to be empty. The empty spaces in our lives – the moments of silence – serve a life sustaining purpose and we should not shut the door to them.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>