Welcome to the LeanForward, Inc. blog, which I’ve titled LeadingForward.

There is no doubt that the subject of leadership has been extensively addressed and that good research and thoughtful writing abound. The trouble, from my perspective, is that we still see far too many examples of irresponsible, unprincipled and ineffective leadership that have had a devastating impact on people and organizations. I want to be part of a movement that changes this reality and creates a core of leaders whose first priority is to serve those they lead and create positive results for all stakeholders.

In August of 2008, I left a decade of employment with Duke University to start my own company, LeanForward, Inc. I’ll wait for another day to discuss the wisdom of walking away from a secure job with a good income in the middle of a global crisis to begin a new venture. For now, just call it a leap of faith. For me, it has been a leap into a huge gap or void; not so much into an unknown and uncertain business climate, but rather into a vacuum created by a lack of principle-based leadership. This vacuum draws me – it compels me—to do something, anything, to help restore the faith people once had in leaders and redeem the hope and trust that have been lost.

The opportunity to work for an organization of the caliber of Duke (and several other good organizations over my career) provided me with a living laboratory for learning about leadership – i.e., what works and what doesn’t work in the real world. As an executive leader in human resources, I’ve had successes and my fair share of failures. I’ve tried to learn from all of these personal experiences, as well as the experiences of others. In fact, I’m still learning. The opportunity I have now is to work outside the confines of a particular organization in an effort to improve the practice of leadership across multiple organizations and industries. One way I can do this is by promoting the practice of “thought leadership.” I believe a good thought leader is someone who is a well-intentioned yet persistent provocateur and revolutionary. Provocateurs challenge embedded mental models – the cognitive shorthand we use each day to evaluate, define and respond to people and situations. Mental models need to be challenged when they keep us from being open to new ideas or inhibit our willingness to examine our conclusions about what is true. Revolutionaries challenge established practices, structures and authority. Practices, structures and authority need to be challenged when they fail to meet the legitimate needs and interests of people and organizations.

My personal mission is to play a part in helping to close the gap and fill the void created by poor leadership, and the systems and thinking that enable it. I hope this forum, and others like it, create a thoughtful, open and practical exchange of provocative, revolutionary and energizing ideas for building strong relationships and accomplishing superior results. I encourage you to join me in this effort. Your comments, suggestions and perspectives are always welcome. You may email at mark.rumbles@leanforwardinc.com.

 

RSS

Mark Rumbles, President

LeanForward, Inc. 

Author of the LeadingForward Blog

« Making Sense of the "00's" | Avoiding Death by Meeting - Part 1 »
Tuesday
Dec152009

Avoiding Death by Meeting - Part II

Meetings should never be viewed as a “necessary evil” or as “off-line” time. As long as people need to collaborate, meetings will always play a central role in our work lives. Accordingly, leaders should strive to transform them into creative, interactive and productive forums for exchanging information, processing ideas, making decisions and mobilizing action.

Last week, I shared five suggestions for making your meetings more purposeful, relevant and engaging. Here are five more ideas for improving how you use your meeting time.

  1. Structure your meetings based on a core purpose. Try to avoid the all purposeall hands on deck staff meetings where everything from strategy to tactics and administrivia to cultural change are discussed. In addition to Daily Check-in meetings (discussed last week), Patrick Lencioni suggests that you hold Weekly Tactical meetings, Monthly Strategic meetings, and Quarterly Off-Site meetings. Each type of meeting will have its own unique format, process and flow. This may seem excessive, but meetings with a purpose-driven structure will actually result in better efficiency, focus and outcomes.
  2. Establish basic ground rules for your meetings. Ideally, your ground rules should address behavioral aspects (e.g., mutual respect, attentiveness) and process elements (e.g., decision-making method and discussion parameters). Keep your ground rules posted and revisit them on a regular basis. Also, include them in your meeting evaluations (see #5 below). 
  3. Encourage and promote meaningful dialogue, and be ready to manage the conflict that will naturally emerge when important issues are on the table. Meaningful dialogue is possible only when respect is balanced with honesty. In other words, people must demonstrate genuine consideration for one another while at the same time speaking their minds. Dialogue is choked off when people filter their thoughts, ideas and feelings, or, alternatively, when they try to force them on others. True dialogue – on issues that really matter to people – will spark emotion and create friction. The key is not to suppress or intensify the heat but simply to use it. When managed skillfully, healthy conflict will keep people engaged, expand the quantity and quality of information and options, and lead to better decisions.
  4. Document your team decisions and reinforce the disciplines of follow-up and follow-through with all meeting participants. Meetings are not ends in themselves; they need to result in post-meeting action of some kind where individuals act on specific commitments. Follow-up is the action an individual takes to clarify or obtain information that will help improve decision-making. Follow-through is the action an individual takes to implement or activate decisions. It is a good idea to have people verbally confirm their commitments to one another during team meetings.  
  5. Leave 5-10 minutes to evaluate the effectiveness of each meeting. You need to assess the process and outcomes of your meetings more than the content. In other words, discuss how well the meeting time was used, not so much what was discussed. It is easy to adjust content. The most effective teams learn how to critically evaluate and continually perfect the quality of their meetings.

Instead of inflicting a slow and agonizing death by meeting, leaders should strive to create the type of meetings that people are dying to attend. I realize that this is a very high bar, but this is true of all worthwhile challenges.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>